logo
dana-white-and-fertitta-brothers


The UFC has a license to print money.  The company's (Zuffa) rise from the ashes is legendary - five years ago, when attempting to sell the money-losing UFC, they could only get offers in the $4 to $2 million range.  Now the company is valued at over a billion dollars (Flash Entertainment paid $120 million for 10% of the company in 2010, which would make it's valuation at $1.2 billion).

But how is the UFC doing so far in 2011 compared to last year?  While Zuffa isn't a public company and therefore don't have to disclose their financial records, several of the company's key financial info is out there in the public for us to analyze.  These would be the UFC's pay-per-view buyrates, its live gate and its fighter salaries.  And taking a look at those stats, Dana White and the Fertitta boys probably wish it was 2010 again.   

Pay-Per-View Buyrates


A large chunk of the UFC's profit comes from the plethora of events they offer on pay-per-view every year.  And the UFC's PPV buyrates have increased every year without exception.  But, as the following chart shows, the streak might be snapped this year:


2010 2011
PPV Buyrate                                         PPV        Buyrate
108  300,000 125 270,000
109  275,000 126 725,000
110  240,000 127 260,000
111  850,000 128 445,000
112  500,000 129 850,000
113  520,000 130 312,500
114 1,050,000 131 330,000
115   520,000
Total 4,255,000 3,192,500
Average 531,875 456,071
PPV $  $       106,375,000  $79,812,500
Difference  $       (26,562,500)


Through the midway point of 2011, the UFC's total buyrate and average buyrate of its PPVs has dropped considerably.  And, based on the approximately $25/sale the UFC gets to keep, the drop in sales results in over $26.5 million less in PPV profits in 2011 than 2010 through the first six months.  Why the dropoff?  Injuries are the main culprit, as hardly a PPV has gone by without one (or both) of the main event participants having to withdraw due to health issues.  Particular troubling for the company's bottom line has been the absence of Brock Lesnar due to a recurrence of his diverticulitis.  The only fighter on the roster who guarantees a million selling PPV, Lesnar's absence from UFC 131 cost the company probably a minimum of 670,000 additional PPVs sold, which works out to be around $16,750,000 in additional profits.  That's a lot of scrilla.


Live Gate

One revenue stream that has increased this year for the UFC is its live gate proceeds.  And this despite the fact that they earned no gate receipts from the Fight For The Troops event.  Through the first six months of 2011, the UFC has taken in about $3.5 million more from the live gate receipts of its events.  UFC 129's record haul of $12 million certainly went a long way in helping the cause.


2010 2011
108  $       1,969,670 125  $     2,174,780
UFN 20  $         753,962 UFN 23  $                -  
109  $       2,273,000 126  $     3,600,000
110  $       2,500,000 127  $     3,500,000
Live 1  $         568,125 Sanchez  $        471,450
111  $       4,000,000 128  $     2,140,000
UFN 21  $         590,685 UFN 24  $     1,182,850
112  $       3,500,000 129  $   12,075,000
113  $       3,270,000 130  $     2,580,000
114  $       3,895,000 TUF 13  $        440,150
115  $       4,221,787 131  $     2,800,000
TUF 11  $         430,000 Live-Kongo  $        562,000
Total  $     27,972,229  $   31,526,230
Difference  $       3,554,001



Fighter Salaries

For the most part, the UFC is paying their fighters the same in 2011 as they did in 2010, with less than a million additional dollars going to the combatants than it did in 2010.  But, remember, this is only reported pay and end of night bonuses - it doesn't include any undisclosed bonuses or PPV profits that some fighters get.

2010 2011
 $     13,333,000  $12,490,000
Difference:  $843,000


When you add up the PPV revenues, live gate receipts and subtract the amount paid to fighters, the UFC is down about $24 million from what it had earned after six months in 2010.  But we're still not going to feel sorry for billionaires, are we?